A conundrum for our police forces
Thursday, June 1st, 2006Something seems strange about the way people are looking at Stephen Harper’s avowed intention of giving stiffer sentences for serious criminal offenses.
I’m not arguing one way or the other about fine-tuning the Criminal Code; in many ways I feel that the punishment should fit the crime — always barring capital punishment. Then we must consider the other — and sociological side of the argument — but that as I said isn’t my purpose here.
Right now we have our police forces across Canada understandably applauding the idea of stiffer sentences and at the same time understandably urging tighter gun control. Now haven’t Harper’s Tories many times over voiced their wish to scrap the gun control registry.
To my mind, what should be written into the criminal code is that possession or sale of handguns and automatic weapons should be regarded as a criminal offense punishable — not by a fine — by imprisonment and confiscation and destruction of the weapons. Collectors, too often vulnerable to theft would have to give up their toys.
Arms manufacturers, too, should be placed under tight scrutiny to determine to whom their products are being distributed– and how.